Visit Pamela Drew's column >>

PAMELA DREWHome Page

muckraker
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 219; Links Seeded: 1669
Member Since: 5/2006

Monsanto Lies, Again (and Again and Again)

advertisement

by cmargulis
Earlier this week, Monsanto was found guilty by France's highest court of false advertising, for claims that Roundup, its toxic weed killer, is biodegradable and leaves "the soil clean." Environmental and consumer rights campaigners brought the French case in 2001, shortly after Monsanto announced its new ethics "Pledge." The advocates noted that glyphosate, Roundup's main ingredient, is classified in Europe as "dangerous for the environment" and "toxic for aquatic organisms."

Monsanto has a long history of fraudulent statements about the safety of Roundup. In 1996, the New York Attorney General fined the company $50,000 for claims that Roundup was, you guessed it, biodegradable and good for the environment.

Glyphosate has been linked to non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and human embryonic cell death. Far from "biodegradable," Monsanto's own studies found residues of glyphosate on food crops up to five months after the chemical was sprayed, and the World Health Organization found "significant residues" of glyphosate after pre-harvest use of the chemical on wheat. This September, the advocacy group Beyond Pesticides and 32 other groups and individuals called on EPA to withdraw approval of glyphosate, citing the growing evidence of health and environmental risks from the pesticide.

The French and New York false advertising cases are far from unique for Monsanto. In 1999, the British Advertising Standards Authority found the company lied about safety testing and environmental benefits in ads about its genetically modified (GMO) crops. The company's history of using fakery, dirty tricks, bogus public relations campaigns, and outright lies is too lengthy to fully outline here. But a few examples are worth noting:

Two labs conducting glyphosate safety studies for Monsanto were cited for "routine falsification of data" and other offenses. One lab study claimed it used "specimens from the uteri of male rabbits…."
An EPA scientist found Monsanto doctored studies and covered-up the dioxin contamination of a wide range of its products. She concluded that the company's behavior constituted "a long pattern of fraud."
In response to the publication of Rachel Carson's groundbreaking indictment of the pesticide industry, Silent Spring, Monsanto and other chemical companies launched a major p.r. offensive. The industry sponsored public forums with purported "independent" experts speaking on the benefits of pesticides; the company's propaganda tools included publication of a pamphlet called The Desolate Years, which posited a world of massive food shortages resulting from over regulation of pesticides (the company continues to repeat this lie to this day, in countless ads and public statements suggesting that food shortages will result unless the world unquestionably accepts its genetic food experiments).
For decades, Monsanto dumped highly toxic PCBs in Anniston Alabama, then spent years covering up the dumping and the attendant health hazards to residents. As the Washington Post reported, …for nearly 40 years, while producing the now-banned industrial coolants known as PCBs at a local factory, Monsanto Co. routinely discharged toxic waste into a west Anniston creek and dumped millions of pounds of PCBs into oozing open-pit landfills. And thousands of pages of Monsanto documents — many emblazoned with warnings such as "CONFIDENTIAL: Read and Destroy" — show that for decades, the corporate giant concealed what it did and what it knew.

Amazingly, following the article, Monsanto lied again: the company told the Post it held no responsibility for its past operations, claiming that the "new" Monsanto was not associated with prior operations of a subsidiary.

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
7.7
{"commentId":10144409,"authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}

In the short version it is worth noting that the "New Monsanto" kept the patents for the Bovine Growth Hormone Posilac and the GMO seeds when they rebirthed themselves as a "Life Sciences" company. What they left with the "Old Monsanto" were all the toxic waste and liabilities.

Now when Monsanto pollutes with contamination from their "life science" products, they sue for fees and the victims become an upside to revenue. How brilliantly Machiavellian to turn pollution to profits!

{"commentId":10144409,"threadId":"704032","contentId":"3394309","authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
  • 4 votes
Reply#1 - Sun Oct 18, 2009 12:18 AM EDT
{"commentId":10144601,"authorDomain":"kimmy123"}

I wouldn't trust them at all.

http://www.saynotogmos.org/monsanto_1.htm

{"commentId":10144601,"threadId":"704032","contentId":"3394309","authorDomain":"kimmy123"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#2 - Sun Oct 18, 2009 12:44 AM EDT
{"commentId":10144841,"authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}

No we can't trust them at all and we should not have to. This link was just added to a Twitter by kvetchingguru and it has a consumer petition to raise our voices for GMO free candy! I'm in!!!

GMO Halloween Candy: A Pesticide-Laden Horror

Target: Hershey's and Mars CEOs
Sponsored by: Center for Environmental Health
With Halloween coming, every parent wonders what sugary treats their kids will find in their trick-or-treat bags. But did you know that sugar from genetically modified (GMO) beets is now in widespread use, despite worldwide scientific concern about the potential health and environmental hazards that GMO crops may create?

The new sugar beets, made by the chemical/biotech giant Monsanto, are resistant to Monsanto's "Roundup" herbicide and are sold along with the herbicide -- meaning higher sales for Monsanto and ultimately more pesticides used on the beets grown for our kids' candies.

Last month, in a stunning setback for the biotech industry, a federal court ruled that genetically modified (GMO) sugar beets should never have been approved for introduction into the food supply. Despite the court's finding, the leading U.S. candy makers Hershey's and Mars have refused to commit to avoiding sugar from GMO beets.

Halloween candy shouldn't be a horror for kids. Tell Hershey's and Mars to end their use of GMO sugar!

Halloween candy should not be a horror!

{"commentId":10144841,"threadId":"704032","contentId":"3394309","authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
  • 3 votes
#2.1 - Sun Oct 18, 2009 1:24 AM EDT
Reply
{"canLink":false,"threadId":"704032","isPrivate":false}
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
{"threadId":"704032","contentId":"3394309"}
Start TrackingStart Tracking
Stop TrackingStop Tracking