Is the Agency Hiding Colony Collapse Disorder Information?
NRDC Forced to Sue to Get Public Records on Bee MysteryWASHINGTON - August 18 - The Natural Resources Defense Council filed a lawsuit today to uncover critical information that the US government is withholding about the risks posed by pesticides to honey bees. NRDC legal experts and a leading bee researcher are convinced that the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has evidence of connections between pesticides and the mysterious honey bee die-offs reported across the country. The phenomenon has come to be called "colony collapse disorder," or CCD, and it is already proving to have disastrous consequences for American agriculture and the $15 billion worth of crops pollinated by bees every year.
EPA has failed to respond to NRDC's Freedom of Information Act request for agency records concerning the toxicity of pesticides to bees, forcing the legal action.
"Recently approved pesticides have been implicated in massive bee die-offs and are the focus of increasing scientific scrutiny," said NRDC Senior Attorney Aaron Colangelo. "EPA should be evaluating the risks to bees before approving new pesticides, but now refuses to tell the public what it knows. Pesticide restrictions might be at the heart of the solution to this growing crisis, so why hide the information they should be using to make those decisions?"
In 2003, EPA granted a registration to a new pesticide manufactured by Bayer CropScience under the condition that Bayer submit studies about its product's impact on bees. EPA has refused to disclose the results of these studies, or if the studies have even been submitted. The pesticide in question, clothianidin, recently was banned in Germany due to concerns about its impact on bees. A similar insecticide was banned in France for the same reason a couple of years before. In the United States, these chemicals still are in use despite a growing consensus among bee specialists that pesticides, including clothianidin and its chemical cousins, may contribute to CCD.
In the past two years, some American beekeepers have reported unexplained losses of 30-90% of the bees in their hives. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), bees pollinate $15 billion worth of crops grown in America. USDA also claims that one out of every three mouthfuls of food in the typical American diet has a connection to bee pollination. As the die-offs worsen, Americans will see their food costs increase.
Despite claims by agribusiness and their supporters, not tests have been done to determine the safety of pollen from gmo crops. It is important to remember that plants that are genetically modified to produce toxins, have that toxic DNA in ever cell of the plant. American policy exempts all gmo foods from any testing for human health or environmental effects and the companies who vouch for their safety are the same ones who assured us PCB's and Agent Orange were safe too. Makes you wonder?
Even if what you say was true, it is completely irrelevant to the article.
It isn't irrelevant to me, considering the agency responsible for investigating the cause has more than one area they're turning a blind eye to. What's more, Bayer is one of the larger growers of gmo crops and those rely on proprietary herbicides and pesticides.
How much of a stretch is that when it incorporates the "plant science" within one company's product line? Enough to irrelevant? Potentially moot given adequate study but not irrelevant.
Before I even read the article I just want to say "FU*K Monsanto!" Arrogant sons of b***hes have no business messing with nature, and the gall to "patent" it ... what the FU*K, huh?! I mean, what the fu*king fu*k!!
O.K. I'm going to read the article now. Be back.
It isn't irrelevant to me
It isn't to me either. What we have here is a classic integrated problem of tremendous complexity which is exactly where agribusiness is going sow Fear Uncertainty and Doubt.
"Recently approved pesticides have been implicated in massive bee die-offs and are the focus of increasing scientific scrutiny," said NRDC Senior Attorney Aaron Colangelo. "EPA should be evaluating the risks to bees before approving new pesticides, but now refuses to tell the public what it knows. Pesticide restrictions might be at the heart of the solution to this growing crisis, so why hide the information they should be using to make those decisions?"
This is apparent collusion between agribusiness and the EPA. So I wonder what the organizational buddy chart looks like? And I expect more than a fewnay sayers with their traditional attacks.
My neighbor up the street and I were talking not to long ago about yard chemicals and organic produce (I recently tore out all of my lawn and planted small crop bearing plants - that's what started the whole conversation); he told me that his grandfather had a farm back in the midwest. It was offered up as a test bed for the new fertilizers being pushed in the 50's and 60's. He told me his grandad regretted that decision from day one. The "scientists" were not forthcoming and what they did was, essentially, to poion many acres of land. The farm dogs that hung around died shortly thereafter of lukemia and eventually so did his grandfather.
But the problem is a bit more dire, our overproduction in crops has lead to an overproduction in people. Global Population was a big concern back in the 50's and 60's and then was summaraly shouted down as "Malthus was wrong". Not so, we've added about 5 billion people to the planet in the last century alone. We're involved in a feedback loop - remember that old commercial: "I use cocaine so I can work harder so I can make more money so I can buy more cocaine..." We're living it, and the good ideas are drying up in the face of reality: we are wrecking the soil, wrecking the air, wrecking the oceans and that big wrecking ball is swinging right back toward us.
In thecase of agribusiness, we have a waste product in search of a market - Nitrogen infusion = "more and better crops" which means expanding markets which means more people which means an increasing demand for "more and better crops". Do you think that chain of connections didn't cross anyone's mind?
Picture a life suffocating algae bloom on a large swath of open water. Now stretch that out over three generations; place it on farmland where it flows into the human poplulation. Simple cause and effect dictates a limit on the productivity of land, even land so artificially enhanced, and then a limit to the human "algae bloom", the sudden collapse of the human population is going to be blamed on many things, "liberals", "wrath of god", whatever; but that sudden decrease will be our own undoing, fomented by greed and "ongoing revenue streams".
If you like Monsanto in the cross hairs you must be on my friends list; I'm biased that way. :~)
If you like gmo Monsanto pieces you can find a solid collection of global reporting on the subject in the GMO Vine group. More than a few people here have a passion for the idea that no one tells us what to swallow and some nice finds on the subject.
My own view takes it one more step and wonders, when foreign genetic material is forced on my body despite my objections and vocal protests, is it like a rape?
If my genetic code is changed, affected by some petrochemical marvel which leaves its distinct disease or deformity do they get any paternity credit. After all, our genetic code tells the story of our ancestry. Science has turned to a virtual orgy of toxic paternal traits, population wide. That goes for all exposures classed as acceptable risks.
Pamela,
My own view takes it one more step and wonders, when foreign genetic material is forced on my body despite my objections and vocal protests, is it like a rape?
It is absolutely rape. It is rape of the natural environment and rape of the citizenry. The justification is the usual "it's not personal, it's business". And, per usual, the "christian" right is on the side of business with the "think of the children" argument...of course it doesn't matter that there are hundreds of millions already aboard that we can't adequatley care for and more on the way.
I got into an argument with a fundamentalist buddy of mine when he said we don't have a population problem, people just can't get enough t eat. There was no Excederin nearby so I blew a gasket; didn't phase him though, apparently us shi**ing all over the planet is part of god's grand plan.
So Whenever I hear the "feeding a hungry world" argument from ADM, Monsanto or their like I just automatically translate it to what it really is: feeding returns to hungry investors.
people just can't get enough t eat.
They could if we found ways to distribute the food we have. Global hunger isn't from a food shortage, but the inability to move food to the hungry. It also amazes me that those in politics who protest loudest for the rights of the unborn, don't seem so moved for the well being once they are delivered into the world and it takes work and money, not just talk to support them.
I agree that Bayer has not been required to use sound science in providing independent studies to show the safety of the neonictinoids to honeybees and pollinators.
However every single major bee researcher involved in the CCD Working Group a multi-discinplinary group of university and government scientists have all discounted the role of these chems in CCD.
A pathogen in combination with nosema a parasitic bacteria have been implicated. Then we also have the role of feedlot beekeepers and the stress and unnatural conditions they keep their bees in is also a contributor or base condition to allowing the pathogen and parasite to flourish.
The claims about Bayer in the beekeeper community are mostly a smoke screen to hide the practices of the feedlot beekeepers. Recent data collected from honey combs in hives that succumed to CCD show massive levels of beekeeper applied miticides (insecticides used to combat the varroa mite). Feedlot beekeepers routinely use chemicals in their hives that build up to lethal and sublethal levels. These chemicals far outweigh the small traces of farm pesticides the bees brought in from outside.
http://www.redorbit.com/news/science/1524991/honey_bees_suffer_from_pesticide_buildup/
good article dingler,
Maybe the acaricides are the cure worse than the cause? They seem to have found a substantive buildup in the wax.
"We do not know that these chemicals have anything to do with Colony Collapse Disorder, but they are definitely stressors in the home and in the food sources," says Dr. Frazier. "Pesticides alone have not shown they are the cause of CCD. We believe that it is a combination of a variety of factors, possibly including mites, viruses and pesticides."
So they attempt to break down the chemicals through irradiation of the wax,
"They used radiation levels at the high end of that used to irradiate foods. Irradiation broke down about 50 percent of the acaricides in the wax."
But ot doesn't sound too promising...
"Beekeepers cannot manage the environmental pesticide contamination as easily as the wax contamination. The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency does regulate and monitor pesticides, but they do not have the ability to monitor the interaction of these chemicals. With the large number of pesticides found in bees and pollen, interactions are likely.
"We are finding fungicides that function by inhibiting the steroid metabolism in the fungal diseases they target, but these chemicals also affect similar enzymes in other organisms," says James Frazier. "These fungicides, in combination with pyrethroids and/or neonicotinoids can sometimes have a synergistic effect 100s of times more toxic than any of the pesticides individually."
If I recall, wasn't Rachel Carson dubbed "crazy" for making this very same statement?
What if it were a combination of factors having a cummulatie effect on the systems of the organisms More often Nature has an interplay of elements. Except in fatal trauma or lethal event a variety of systems fail, things go like dominos, from each to the next.
Weakened immune systems are ore susceptible to virus and bacterial agents. Can those come from exposure to genetic material, historically taken as a pure food resources, but now containing viral and bacterial promoters in it's altered DNA. No doubt that agribusiness, factory farm style abuses across the entire food industry, from the seed to the store has devastating effects, as do chemicals.
dingler is exceptionally well informed about bees and while we sometimes take different views there are few better sources of research and first hand experiences and makes us much smarter.
Thanks for the kind words.
Something to keep in mind is how many of the GMO crops do honey bees actually get nectar or pollen from?
The answer is not typically corn maybe soybeans in certain climate, definetely canola and cotton. The Bayer seed coatings are mostly used on corn right now although that could change soon.
While I am concerned about GMO and Bayer chems the peer reviewed literature showing serious problems with these technologies concerning honeybees is just not there. With so many interests looking into this possible problem especially in the EU, one would think that by now we would have some good data.
My goal is to expose the massive contamination of hives by beekeepers, we clearly have the data and even the industry itself admits that 85% or more beekeepers use harsh chemicals and even antibiotics in their hives on a routine annual basis.
If we want to do something to save honeybees besides rant on blogs and say how we're all going to die yada yada etc., we could start with delisting Apistan and Checkmite as section 18 legal products. Many feedlot beekeepers buy the active ingredient fluvalinate and compaphous and make their own illegal treatments (the chemical is only legal when sold as an end use product) . Thus the additional step is to get EPA to allow zero tolerance of these chemicals in honey. That would shut down the massive and widespread use of these chemicals.
You earned the kind words. While outlawing toxins is always a goal it can sometimes take a while. Would you think that buying Local and Organic honey would help some in the meantime?
Fipronil or what ever name it is given kills bees. Colony collapse and fipronil have a direct link. Where ever there is fipronil in the environment there are no bee's.
http://www.drsfostersmith.com/Product/prod_display.cfm?pcatid=7200
We are @!$%#ed...
Of course it is Monsanto's fault. Big business only sees $$$$$$$$$$ could care less about the damage they cause the world. Pharmeceutical companies spawn a new med for everything under the sun without testing it first; FDA is in their back pocket.
Listen to the side effects, they are worse than the initial condition......Sheesh!!
Shabby EPA -- they're just shabby. I could say that about the whole (you know).
Anyway, good seed, Pamela. I cannot stand this war on science garbage. The administration is totally in the pocket of the corporations, and now all the neocon chickens are coming home to roost -- fallout about rising food prices, health hazards and some sectors of economy suffering the brunt of the continual assault of chemicals. Meanwhile all of us are paying more at the grocery store.
I know that you meant the powerful at EPA but I like to be clear. I've got friends at EPA, all of us do and it is important to distinguish between the Administrators from industry on the top tier who rot and the bulk of hardworking, caring career folks, who try their best to do the right thing, even in the face of great resistance and hardship, because they do care about the importance of the job!
Canaries in the coal mine.
They are singing loudly too!
What I meant was that the bees are more sensitive to environmental factors than we are and if something is killing them we should pay attention, it is much more than just losing a major pollinator and a lot of food crops. There silence is much more meaningful. the canary is lying dead in the bottom of the cage.
And frogs are going this way, too. Dan Hallo had a seed on it.
Do you have a link to Dan's seed? I love seeing links here to anything that makes us smarter.
If you google five legged frogs you will be amazed and probably a little concerned.
Thank you both for the links. I've clipped them but once upon a time every environmental piece we wrote or seeded was tagged with the term greenvine. You could try it and see who may have it watch listed and to help in a sitewide search for econews.
Dang, getting smarter all the time, thank you!!
a new article on honeybees and the Bayer chems - amazingly accurate without any bogus speculation. this article is the real deal and explains quite well the current situation.
http://www.capitalpress.info/main.asp?SectionID=67&SubSectionID=616&ArticleID=44085&TM=54280.73
Thank you so much for the link. Can you seed it to your column so we can clip it to groups as an archived resource? Thanks if you can link it from here too! :~)
Interesting comment by Thom Theobald at the bottom of the article:
Bayer spokesman Greg Coffey is either sadly misinformed or intentionally misleading when he says that neonicotinoids couldn't possibly be the culprit since their use has been widespread for many years and CCD is "a recent occurence".
To the contrary, I began reporting high colony losses with symptoms now described as CCD in 1995, as did many other beekeepers. CCD simply exploded on the national scene in 2006, but has been present for many years. Imidicloprid use began in 1994. Look more closely. Don't be misled by these desperate attempts at evasion and spin doctoring by Bayer and it's pestitute opologists in the EPA, the USDA and academia.
Look more closely. Don't be misled by these desperate attempts at evasion and spin doctoring by Bayer and it's pestitute opologists in the EPA, the USDA and academia.
This is a profound statement, which applies to the entire spectrum of activity classified as "crop science" that is run by petrochemicals turned to agribusiness. It is all built on deceptions.
It gets even more interesting when you check out who some of the largest corporate agribusiness land owners are. Big surprise, it's the chemical companies that make all that crap in the first place.
It gets even more interesting when you check out who some of the largest corporate agribusiness land owners are. Big surprise, it's the chemical companies that make all that crap in the first place.
Funny how that works, isn't it? One degree of separation between the fools and their money.
The military-industrial complex has expanded to contaminate acedemia.
Much funding (cash, the latest lab equipment etc) goes to scientists who then act as the R&D arm of industry. Though this isn't necessarily a bad thing, it incurs "conflict of interest" when objective analysis is to be done - who wants to bite the hand that feeds? Another issue I have with it is that industry is using publicly financed institutions (infrastructure) to realize massive cost savings in R&D. So, IMO, on our backs they get the research, they get the patents, and the get the test results they demand, none of which is good for the citizenry.
Yes indeed, under the Reagan plan for smaller government we gave the Land Grant University research to make private patents and support for corporate marketing. Taxpayer dollars that helped make education affordable for all became a way to add profits for the corporate friendsters and cherry pick those who show "promise" by giving money to followers of specific schools of thought.
It's a huge clusterf#@k now and the petrochemical companies are lovin' it straight to the bank.
Maybe in two or three million years, some new form of intelligent life will have evolved, and perhaps, the one thing remaining form the civilisation that was once mankind will be Mt. Rushmore, and four the curious faded faces. If Rat-sapiens can even recognize it a s a face.
Most likely the next attempt at intelligent life will be aquatic. Oops, it's already there.
Without the opposable thumbs to go with the consciousness, developing a civilization will be a bit difficult.
But then (for anything with a human form, not to mention anything that does not possess the "sacred" human form), holding deeper understanding, awareness and compassion within the consciousness, sometimes referred to as "elitist" in some quarters, has proved near impossible for many of our species.
It makes me glad to be old enough to be on the downhill slide in my own right and sad to see how little we have managed to protect and pass on for future generations to enjoy and sustain them.
Without the opposable thumbs to go with the consciousness, developing a civilization will be a bit difficult.
Pincher's work. Or suckers, or tentacles. Thumbs are overrated. Bush has them and look how stupid he is.
Probably the story of most of our lives, so much potential at the beginning to wind up where we are. Like I tell everybody, My one contribution to the human race is that I didn't create another entry.
We need every variety people, doing different things that try to bring balance, joy and life together.
Thumbs are overrated. Bush has them and look how stupid he is.
Thanks for the laugh Dan - that's true.
And we all know where he's hiding those thumbs.
--------------------------
atsidiwashichu
My one contribution to the human race is that I didn't create another entry.
That's the way I look at it too. This overpopulation problem we have, with its attendant social and habitat problems, is more the result of mindless cultural repetition than of any desire to create a better world. There are a lot of folks pushing out babies through sheer ignorance whether it be fomented by religious belief or simple unawareness of birth control. In a case like this "every child is a blessing" is more a curse: It's the worship of the human form to the detriment of anything that doesn't look like us.
IMO, one of the most important contributions a person can make to humanity is that of consciousness or awareness; sensitivity to the beauty of the planet and the importance of all life on it.
Several years back I was fortunate enough to hear a leacture by Craig San Roque. He's a Jungian analyst who worked with the aborigines in Australia. The tribal elders, he reported, couldn't understand how the western european mind could function. They saw us as only having half of a mind, the other half, that half tied to the earth in understanding of its significance, was conspicuously absent to them.
Very good. Perhaps that is one reason I consider myself Indian in spirit if not genetic makeup. We are all part of a whole and everything is part of everything else.
Perhaps that is one reason I consider myself Indian in spirit if not genetic makeup.
Then you may enjoy a DVD entitled The Dreamkeeper. It touches on your sentiment in a profound way. It joins together a lot of native American mythology into a fascinating storyline.
I found it inspirational and touching: The Dreamkeeper
Aww thank you. ☀
I will make a point of finding a copy. There is a series out produced by Kevin Costner called 500 Nations. It is extremely enlightening and I am helping to get this whole thread off topic. Didn't mean to. Seems like it was originally about bees dying off. Might I suggest that if you live any where that it might be possible to do so, get a bee hive and hope for the best. You won't regret doing so. They are fascinating creatures.
No off topic apologies here. So long as someone isn't being mean or making an effort to derail just to spark conflict, where ever we wander works for me. Dwight O has bees, he wrote an article called we got bees!, when they arrived and there are more than a few others here. It's a great idea.
Thanks Pamela,
Since I live in the city my neighbors probably wouldn't approve of me beekeeping so I do the next best thing. I naturescape as much as possbile around my crop areas ( I removed my lawn, established water catchments to ~ 600 gal, and my front yard is all berry bushes and tomato plants, backyard is the "big" garden). I plant to attract hummingbirds, Butterflies and bees. Last year my side yard was covered in Crimson Clover, the neighbors loved it and many commented on the abundance of bees that year.
I'd like to figure out how to create a small frog habitat and re-introduce crickets. I don't know if any of you live in the city but I really miss the sound of crickets at night.
Other than that no chemicals for me, it's either weed by hand or don't weed at all...usually the latter.
Chances are that your neighbors wouldn't even realize that it was you provided all the bees coming in and helping their little backyard garden along. They are actually very innocuous unless you happen to have Africanized bees, they are a bit more aggressive.
frogs should be easy if you have open water catchments---they eat bees and crickets though. If you went somewhere and caught a bunch of crickets, chances are you would be overrun with them in no time.
they are a bit more aggressive.
In the same way that Dick Cheney is a bit more aggressive than the workers.
Fipronil or what ever name it is given kills bees. Colony collapse and fipronil have a direct link. Where ever there is fipronil in the environment there are no bee's.
http://www.drsfostersmith.com/Product/prod_display.cfm?pcatid=7200
Since man has kept bees he has lost bees. Dead hives are nothing new. Blame the weather, pesticides or what ever.
The real problem here is in the 1990's the varroa mite came to North America and beekeepers started putting chemicals into their hives like never before.
85% of all beekeepers and 95% of all managed hives in the USA have residues of these chemicals. One of the chemicals trade name APistan was increased in strength without the beekeepers knwledges in the late 1990's
It does not take a Phd to figure out that ppb traces of ag chemicals will never reach the same levels of ppm that chemicals that were willingly dumped into hives. Duh!!!!
LD50 levels of fluvalinate and comaphous are now common in hive combs, I am very familiar with Mr. T Theobald and he willingly admits to using these chems.
Its always something else - Bayer is the scapegoat. We have no data on Bayer that nails the coffin. We don't even have incriminating data that leads to more studies. It just is not there folks.
Why is it I and other who do not use chemicals in their hives have no losses? I had so many bees this year we had a hard time keeping up.
do a web search on Apistan or Checkmite and then google the active ingredients.
do a web search on Apistan or Checkmite and then google the active ingredients.
What's almost as disturbing is that the honey has an exemption for the chemical residues!!
Available Products
Currently, there are three products with Section 3 (General Use) registration available for controlling V. destructor. These are Apistan® (fluvalinate), Mite-Away II™ (formic acid) and Sucrocide™ (sucrose octonaote esters). In addition, CheckMite+® (coumaphos) and Api-Life VAR® (thymol, menthol and eucalyptus oil) have been granted Emergency Exemptions from registration (Section 18) by the US-EPA. These latter two products are only available in those states that have applied for and received Emergency Exemptions, which must be renewed each year.Pesticide Resistance
Resistance to the two major pesticides, Apistan® and CheckMite+®, is widespread. This is problematic because the resistance status of the mite population must be determined before treating a colony, rather than after. Presently, such a determination is difficult to obtain. See http://www.masterbeekeeper.org/ or to http://www.ba.ars.usda.gov/beelab/ for information on making this determination. There is no known resistance to formic acid (Mite-Away II™) at this time.Established pesticide tolerances
Honey may contain 0.05 ppm fluvalinate and 0.1 ppm coumaphos. Beeswax may contain 100 ppm coumaphos. Remember! These are limits, not goals. Always think of pesticides as a means of last resort. Formic acid and sucrose octanoate esters are exempt from tolerance when used in accordance with label instructions. Menthol, thymol and eucalyptus oil (the active ingredients in Api-Life VAR®) are also exempt from tolerance, but their exempt status is subject to periodic renewal.
Apistan
Active Ingredient: Fluvalinate (8.8g/strip)
Adverse Effects: Increased adult bee mortality for fluvalinate has been assessed at 2.7 bees/day over 60 days52. Significantly less (86% vrs. 97%) drones emerged from colonies treated with Apistan than control colonies, but survival was greater for both compared to varroa infested colonies (59%). Both varroa and Apistan caused reductions in drone body weight and various glands125. In queen cages, exposure to 1% fluvalinate for 3 days caused significant mortality in worker attendants and increased supersedure in queens. Exposure for 7 days caused significant mortality in queens.
http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/pests-diseases/animals/varroa/paper/varroa-treatment-options.htm#4
Sometimes digging into the studies done for approval, you start seeing the ones that were terminated and withdrawn, few with cause cited.
There are always good reasons to abandon a study, but it gives me the creepiest sense that only the shortest terms and mildest results made the cut. Even then, many are chilling in known effects.
Goddamn Big Business is going to kill us all.
Thank goodness Gaia will continue and life may prevail.
Goddamn Big Business is going to kill us all.
They've had a hell of a run but they're done now, they never faced the likes of us before!
Right on, sista!
Where do I throw the javelin?
Hey, Pamela, did you read about the fireflies?
We are seeing the most massive extinction ever right before our eyes.
No, but thank you I'll go read it now. In some ways it all seems like my worst fears playing out in slow motion, so many years after it all fell into place for me. The part that brings gladness and hope is that every day more eyes do see what must be done.
I am with you all the way up and down the foodchain, my friend.
That's sad, I love the fireflies. Looks like private property "rights" win out over the natural world every time.
Since I couldn't sleep lat night I law awake thinking of Taxes and how we hear a lot of complaints by the rich on their fair share..blah...blah..blah... yet we never even address the issue of what is really paying the ultimate tax: our planet. The planet and all its other life does not even have a say in our extractive and abusive methods. It's ridiculous to me. But it's easy to do when one disconnects themselves from the earth because some book told them that "god" gave the earth to them..
You're exactly right Ire. What happens is that government which is supposed to function as a balance between public benefit and private opportunity has been broken to serve interests of private profits without accounting for social costs. Then the PR comes in and we get creators of Superfund sites skating off with taxpayer subsidized Land Grant research to design fee based life in the corporate image. Sadly everything they touch does have distinct indicator of its genetic heritage.
We will stop it now though, it's a mighty task but people can surprise you.
Thanks Pamela,
That does give me heart. I really think people are waking up to the fact that we do need to care for the earth and all living things; it's not just "hippy" stuff, it's a practical and mature approach to living in and with the universe...
BTW I send you a friendship request.
I'm getting a sore hand from clicking the Vote, for these post over the last few days..
My bets on Chemicals, buy stock in those. Gas is a chemical also.
You can read the label on pesticides, on the back it reads can do harm to fish, and bees!!!! No kidding, you don't say??!! You mean to tell me if I spray this stuff on my bushes and flowers, the bees will die along with the Japanese Beetle?!!! Yes, this stuff kills all living things, remember that next time you apply this crap to your plants.
Water, and a few drops of soap will deter most bugs; Spray heavily on plants, during the morning hours. Presto, you will not only have pest free flowers, but they will be sparkling clean!!!!!
Now, I need to go brush my teeth using the Famous and very safe chemical "Fluoride"
Then I can rinse with my ultra safe diethylstilbestrol bottled water, and watch my male breast grow grow grow!!!!
formic, sucrocide, apiguard and apivar would be considered organic treatments by most of the organic certification houses. the ingredients are either naturally found in food even honey (formic acid) or will not pose a risk in bees or humans. none of these materials accumulate in the comb
the real bad actors are fluvalinate and coumaphos. feedlot beekeepers buy the bulk ag form in liquid of these chems and make their own treatments of rags of cardboard strips. this is illegal as its not a labeled or registered application. there is obviously a higher risk for honey contamination or injury to bees when Gomer is mixing his own treatments. the general consensus is hit and hit em hard.
the real solution is selecting a bee or breeding a bee that has a natural defense to the mite - that can coexist with a mite load. this is being done successfully by many. a simple idea - let all the bees an apiary alone and what left, maybe 20% after several years will be resistant - breed from that stock then. there are other traits dealing with hygenic behaviour that also can be bred for. lots of soft or natural angles to solve this problem
there is obviously a higher risk for honey contamination or injury to bees when Gomer is mixing his own treatments
The unforeseen elements that come with commerce, dang it was nice to see you hit that too. :~)
Even if everybody got together and stopped all the pesticide insanity in this country, there is still the rest of the world. For the most part, when a chemical is banned in this country, the company just increases it's production in some other country. I doubt that China is too concerned about the use of chemicals on their food crops or anything else they produce for human consumption. That's why I stopped eating anything produced in China. Then there is all the food stuff we import from that great bastion of ecological awareness Mexico. They still use DDT and who knows what else that has been banned in the U.S.
Then there is the issue of lead, Mercury, and other heavy metals that are finding their way more and more into our food chain. The more you look into it the more depressing it is. It isn't just about the bees, like I said earlier, they are just the canaries in the coal mine.
See. This is why liberals want to conquer the world. Didn't you know?
Anymore it seems that the only choice we have (if we have one) is do we want to grease the slide our little hand basket to hell is on or do we opt for a little sand to slow it down? In either event it is most likely only a matter of time.
It seems the whole "good for business" argument is falling apart at the seams, hopefully before we destroy the planet.
I mean, look at how our business model is structured:
We have Marketing-Design-Production-Sales...
There's very little in the way of product effect (what little there is is now either entirely corrupted in its mission or encounters massive counter-attack from the manufacturers, some of which is the infantile "whiny nanny crat" statements that come from that quarter).
And the one thing that is lacking nearly completely is product reclamation and packaging disposal. All this stuff is the responsibility of the consumer.
I really think there can be a better business model but there needs to be more foresighted people. Unfortunately, many of those with foresight are pilloried by the right
Yes, I think Jefferson had it right all along. Get on the bread standard and not the gold standard.
Jefferson was right about a lot of things. Wonder what he would have to say about our current state of affairs and the Corporate States of America. He and all his contemporaries would probably be spinning in their graves looking for their guns.
I doubt that China is too concerned about the use of chemicals on their food crops or anything else they produce for human consumption. That's why I stopped eating anything produced in China. Then there is all the food stuff we import from that great bastion of ecological awareness Mexico. They still use DDT and who knows what else that has been banned in the U.S.
When you dig into those you find they are funded by the same multinationals as here. Part of what people need to do is come clean with all their money. The 401K savings that are in "global growth" funds are paying for these cheap factoryies and chemical plants.
People need to invest in their communities, shop locally, save locally and invest locally. When the money goes elsewhere you need to look carefully at where it is going. The market will respond to the flow of dollars but it takes a lot of us voting for smaller solutions to start the momentum rolling at a good clip! We can do it, one by one, day by day, purchase by purchase it will change!!
Would if I could. I live out in the sticks 15 miles from the nearest town which has one little store. to shop the nearest town is Twin Falls Id. about 55 miles away. About the best I can do is read labels and buy accordingly-- if I am doing the shopping, which isn't often and I can't get her into anything of that nature because she thinks is doesn't matter.
she thinks is doesn't matter.
Awww. there are a few folks I love who have the same view. It's tough with the people we care for so deeply and this gets into a very personal view. Like kiddies, you hope enough love and time will help them to come around enough to understand why you care about it. I'll cross my fingers too!
We have been together for going on 18 years and she is only marginally into the food thing because of my ranting and raving about it all the time and is firmly convinced that there is no point in voting because of the electoral college and all the money involved in the elections. At times I think she might be right on that one.
"Dont buy a single vote more than necessary. I'll be damned if I am going to pay for a landslide" -Joseph P Kennedy. as quoted by JFK
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |