How pure would it look with Joe Camel on there?
Americans have lost their collective minds. That's all I can figure on the heels of the announcement that children as young as eight are now being prescribed dangerous cholesterol lowering drugs to combat heart disease.
There is no doubt that we have a generation ravaged by diabetes and obesity. but these drugs have never been tested for long term effects on children.
Children are not small adults and the long term implications of treatments won't be known for years, even decades.
What's more this is a classic, short term reaction in our society; when in doubt offer some pharma remedy to treat the symptoms rather than address the underlying problem.
The real problem is that we have had agribusiness and petrochemical companies controlling the food supply for more than a decade.
Our food has been transformed by a partnering of the Agent Orange makers of Dow, Dupont and Monsanto who have been feeding Americans untested, genetically altered forms of foods in conjunction with the processing by big tobacco, Phillip Morris who owns Nabisco, Kraft and dozens more trusted brands under the new name Altria Group.
Is it really any surprise that the companies responsible for products that have serious adverse health effects or slow death would make a food system that creates a population of sick people?
Americans better start demanding to know what we are swallowing because the handwriting is on the wall. It is a simple fact that you are what you eat. Thanks to a corrupt and spineless Congress, a system of industry controlled government has fed profits at the expense of human health and the environment.
For nearly a decade I have tracked the legislation, politics, science and spin surrounding the genetically altered foods. My research has braqnched off into other areas of the FDA and USDA policy and the truth is an ugly picture of a Nation that is dying for profits.
The Congress has destroyed the economy and Iraq, but the oil companies and contractors are flourishing. So too it the identical picture in the food and drug business. Corporate profits are at the expense of the trusting public.
Anyone who believes that the unseen hand of Congress is manifesting any better results is sadly mistaken. We are being fed a boatload of %$#@ no matter what measure you use.
Nature will not bend to the will of Congress. As rates of illness soar and food allergies skyrocket, I continue to wonder how long it will be before the American media begins to talk about what has been done to our food! We are a Nation dying for profits and children on statins is a symptom that should serve as a wake up call.
Anyone who believes that the unseen hand of Congress is manifesting any better results is sadly mistaken. We are being fed a boatload of %$#@ no matter what measure you use.
I think were being fed something worse...
While we let our corporations grow our food supply in other countries because it generates more profits we tax payers spend mountains of cash maintaining an expanded food testing program.
How much money would we save for alternative government programs, like healthier school lunches, if we didnt have to test giant volumes of food as it crosses our borders. Plus sending inspectors on trips across the globe to examine the standards of foreign food companies.
Beyond saving money our food supply would be alot more secure.
The USDA has even prevented one meat packer, Creekstone Farms, from doing their own testing of their animals to certify that they are free of BSE (mad cow disease). The USDA claims in its suit that the tests are "worthless", even though these are the same tests the government uses to test the randomly selected 40,000 of the 35 million cows slaughtered each year. It's also the same tests the European Union uses to test all cattle.
The case was decided in Creekstone's favor in 2007, but the USDA chose to file an appeal which is still moving through the courts. The real reason, it seems, is that the meatpacking mega-corporations have exerted their influence on the department. They worry that if one producer tests, then all the producers will be forced by the market to test their animals. Wouldn't that be a shame...
Ethical guidelines for drug approval/ longitudinal testing anyone?
Children should not be on prescription drugs!
This is not something that children should ever be medicated for. The doctors should be sending these kids to nutritionists and adjusting their diets, not pumping them full of pharmaceuticals.
I have border line high cholesterol and all my doctors have tried to put me on them. I simply refuse, my heart and arteries are healthy and I see no reason to go on them.
To put a child on them is unthinkable improve the diet and put the child on fish oil, along with a less fatty diet.
There is a great deal of research that is being done on statins and some of the results are frightening. One of the side affects is a loss of memory. It appears much like alzheiner's disease, one lady was almost admitted to a nursing home but the doctor doing the study at USC San Diego, took her off the statins and she got better.
Our society is depending way to much on these medications when looking at herbs and natures remedy's many times is all we really need to do.
One of the side affects is a loss of memory. It appears much like alzheiner's disease
This is what my grandfather is going through right now. He had a mild stroke but had no permanent damage and they put him on these drugs. My poor grandmother is so upset about it because her husband is not himself she's called me on the verge of tears. He can't remember anything, he gets confused easily. My grandparents are in their late 70's and used to be on no prescription drugs, active and living in a cabin on a quiet lake in Wisconsin. They do their own yard work and are very healthy people but this one drug is taking my grandfather's memory and could take their independence away from them if it gets worse. I wish they would go somewhere for a second opinion.
The great Cure all.Snake oil.
Man if you keep losing at spades, you gonna lose all your wham whams and zoom zooms
MONEY.
You see the Doc for five minutes and all of a sudden he knows you.Only knows your name ,usually,as it's on the chart,put there by the nurse who spent 8 minutes in your presence.
Here's your pretty pills.Thank you Doc."That Dr.Shmuck,now he's one good Doc, I can tell by the lab coat he's wearing,Real smart he is ,that Doc.And handsome to boot!"
No dear,that was the nurses aid and he is real smart.
The Drug industry have decided they are going to make their next fortune on statins, and they are going to keep introducing more alleged reasons why we should all be on them from cradle to the grave
The people responsible for this mess...well, they are either brain addled due to too many drugs or are lining their pockets - no way could this be happening through honest evaluation of the options.
Btw,where is that big Fatty.My POT is not illegal. The Marijuana Stamp Tax Act of 1937 was ruled unconstitutional by the US Supreme Court in 1969 and instructed the Johnson administration to act accordingly.They didn't,because the Nixon Adm. took power and took the same body of law that was the Marijuana Stamp Tax Act and put it under the umbrella of the Dangerous Drugs and Abuse Act of 1970,equalizing it through psychological tactics,misinformation and propaganda with manmade adulterants designed to enslave.Marijuana was/is not illegal to possess for the private citizen,only for those seeking to make a profit... corporations...etc . without the Tax Stamp applied to the product..as is tobacco and it's stamp on the single packages of cigarrettes and cartons.The ones who profit off the "illegality " of marijuana is the Drug Cartels and the law enforcement institutions and the ones who are "Paid off" to keep this truth to themselves,by bribes ,making them complicit in this crime against us.That is how they retain control of the marketing and distribution. from my comment on... http://drknow.newsvine.com/_news/2008/06/23/1602381-federal-marijuana-monopoly-challenged and my own research at Oklahoma University Law Center and the motions I filed in Cleveland County ,Norman,Oklahoma in 1995-1996. Of course the judges threw ou all my motions but they are still on record somewhere and they had the desired effect.They have an easier softer way policy in Norman,Ok. now.At the discretion of the officer. A little at a time.sigh....soon.
Yeah let's give our kids more drugs. This is stupid. Although if parents gave their kids let's say a banana or an apple instead of MacDonalds. They wouldn't have this problem in the first place. Stupid just plain stupid. And cruel to children.
This is just one more example of anything goes if it will make money. Latest research shows that for most of us the higher our cholesterol the longer we can expect to live. Have a look at the argument set out here.
This paper provides a number of reasons why skepticism may be good for the health. Few people are aware of the danger of statin drugs. Few know the true story about fats and oils.
I will reveal to you all the ultimate diet, that is guaranteed to to make you lose weight and keep it off forever, Yes folk 100% money back Guarantee no questions asked, but for all here on Newsvine I will reveal its secret for free, Yes FREE !! so for the first time ever here is the miracle you have been waiting for.
" EAT LESS™ "
Yes all you have to do is eat less and you will not only lose weight but you'll save thousands of $$$ too, So for this one time only you can use this exclusive program and lose all the weight you want.
Hmmm better take some more Sarcasmo™ I feel an attack coming on *sigh*
You can live just fine by substituting pasta with rice and candy with fresh fruit. Teach kids good eating habits and they'll have that with them for the rest of their lives.
Pamela, that article I linked to above did not make the case that high cholesterol was good but the references within it did. Here is one which does.
Here's another:
http://www.thincs.org/
Great links....thanks
Hi Pamela, this is slightly off topic, but I'm curious about the correlation of chicken additives to menstrual cycles starting at earlier ages for our girls. Have you come across this tie-in in your research?
Thanks,
Ann
Thank you for your response. I have come across many of the information roadblocks that you've mentioned on my somewhat limited attempts to find more information. In addition to reading up on Monsanto rBGH, I will try your "follow the money" approach :)
Are there any "impartial" websites that you'd recommend?
Thank you VERY MUCH, Pamela. Also sending you a friends request. I appreciate your help.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |