Visit Pamela Drew's column >>

PAMELA DREWHome Page

muckraker
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 219; Links Seeded: 1672
Member Since: 5/2006

Bad News About Pesticides? End Pesticide Reporting!

advertisement

My fellow American consumers, welcome to the Orwellian version of protection that plays as public service by the corporate government in Washington.

The same Agencies, we the public fund with tax dollars, to protect us, are stepping up to protect industry instead.

This is shocking or shockingly routine, depending on your mainstream media diet but it is stunning in the clear message it sends to citizens. Eh, what you don't know won't hurt you, just close your eyes.

We are being protected in yet another new and different way, now we'll be saved from knowing anything that will negatively impoact the growth of the petrochemical markets, earnings and liability.

Whew, Uncle Sam always knows when to spare my little brain from details it doesn't need. Don't I feel smart to be in such good company with so many esteemed sources able to not know too.

What a lot of not knowers we'll be. Now researchers and other regulatory agencies like the EPA will be not knowing as much as me.

As acreage of the gmo crops has soared so has the chemical volume and strength to treat them. No sense alarming the public with figures on pesticide use.

We are going to talk about the numbers in Hillary's math to the White House for the next month. How many more numbers do voters really need to see?

No sense confusing folks by thinking about negatives when we can simply cut the reporting to unreported. With a stroke of the pen, the problem is solved.

It was about two years ago the FED did the same thing. They stopped reporting the M3 figures for the money supply and now we've got more money circulating than anyone can shake a stick at. No one even knows how much. How great is that? This not knowing is a catchy theme that's really caught on.

Success inspires imitation; all through our government the failings have vanished. If ignorance is bliss we are well on our way to the happiest time in America's history. Nirvana in a simple, don't look, don't find policy.

Here's a straighter take on the most recent outrage from the Center for Food Safety.

Elimination of USDA's Program Will Perpetuate Misinformation on Pesticide Use in U.S. Agriculture, Groups Charge

Washington, DC - May 20, 2008 - The day before the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) releases its scaled-back annual report on 2007 pesticide use in American agriculture, a coalition of 44 environmental, sustainable farming, and health advocacy organizations called on USDA to reverse its plan to eliminate its pesticide reporting program in 2008. Elimination of USDA's objective data will open the door wide to serious misinformation on pesticide use, charge the groups. USDA claims it lacks funding to continue the program.

"Americans are rightly concerned about the adverse impacts of pesticides on human health and the environment," said Charles Benbrook, Chief Scientist at The Organic Center. "Without USDA's data, our organizations will be severely hampered in our ability to carry out research on the impacts of pesticides and offer informed input on decision-making regarding pesticide use and pest management systems in American agriculture."

Dr. Benbrook, former Executive Director of the Board on Agriculture of the National Academy of Sciences, is one of the country's leading agricultural authorities, and has used USDAs pesticide data extensively in his work for many years.

"We strongly oppose this move by USDA to cut the legs off its publicly available database. Denying the public and regulatory agencies this critical information is bad science and bad public relations," said Jennifer Sass, Senior Scientist at the Natural Resources Defense Council.

State pesticide officials and major agribusiness groups have also objected to USDA's plan to end its pesticide survey and reporting program, say the groups. Others who rely on USDA data include the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), academic scientists, and USDA's Office of Pest Management Policy.

Heck, why should all that information be available. People can just shutup and swallow whatever Congress and their lobbyists toss to us. Who does this government belong to anyway?

  • 28 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
90
16
{"commentId":1824773,"authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}

The CFS news release and the site has helpful information on actions and consumer protections.

{"commentId":1824773,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
  • 8 votes
Reply#1 - Wed May 21, 2008 2:32 AM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":1825051,"authorDomain":"djehuty"}

This is getting more than just scary, Pamela

{"commentId":1825051,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"djehuty"}
  • 8 votes
Reply#2 - Wed May 21, 2008 7:30 AM EDT
{"commentId":1826372,"authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
This is getting more than just scary, Pamela

Once you let a group have the right to kill and maim without consequence, it's hard to find the line where the right trade off between deaths, injuries and profits strike the perfect balance.

A few years ago there was the EPA CHEERS program where low income families could get $600 and a cam corder to expose their children to pesticides and household chemicals. That was to determine unsafe exposure limits but public outcry stopped it.

Now we don't need to worry where the limits are, all deadly effects will be forever removed from the cause. Americans can keep up the feel good fraud of, Race for the Cure instead.

Texans for Public Justice has a good bio on Nancy Brinker, Bush Pioneer and Ambassador to Hungry and her PR bonanza behind Race for the Cure, that is both a distraction from cause and a huge money making, goodwill whitewashing strategy. Pure genius!!

{"commentId":1826372,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
  • 4 votes
#2.1 - Wed May 21, 2008 12:18 PM EDT
{"commentId":1826769,"authorDomain":"ffeineandsugar"}

I'm sending this out to as many people as I can (thinkbeforeyoupink). Thanks for the info, as always.

{"commentId":1826769,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"ffeineandsugar"}
  • 2 votes
#2.2 - Wed May 21, 2008 1:41 PM EDT
{"commentId":1829117,"authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}

My pleasure; that wench Brinker gives me a big time cramp. I've written about her cancer treatment centers and lobbying to keep oncology drug pricing with the providers, a system most oncologists abhor and oppose. Sad racket and pitiful reflection of not for profits and corporate government.

{"commentId":1829117,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
  • 1 vote
#2.3 - Thu May 22, 2008 1:41 AM EDT
{"commentId":2749515,"authorDomain":"bev5k"}

I agree with you comments. I have been a RFTC supporter for almost 9 years... I am a 9-year breast cancer survivor and considered myself in the inner sanctum of a group I thought was doing the world good.

Now, come to find out, many of the companies that manufacture chemotherapy drugs are manufacturing harmful chemicals through their crops science group that ended up on the EPA's list of endocrine disruptors. And it has been suggested Komen and Brinker may be involved with these companies. I was exposed to large amounts of chemicals growing up and one of them, chlordane, is found in large amounts in breast cancer tissue. This is just the tip of the iceberg.

I have neighbors who spray like crazy. I am trying to get some limits on residential spraying. Search for my video on YouTube by searching beepesticidefree. Help stop the madness!!!

{"commentId":2749515,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"bev5k"}
  • 1 vote
#2.4 - Thu Sep 4, 2008 9:39 AM EDT
{"commentId":2765351,"authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
Now, come to find out, many of the companies that manufacture chemotherapy drugs are manufacturing harmful chemicals through their crops science group that ended up on the EPA's list of endocrine disruptors. And it has been suggested Komen and Brinker may be involved with these companies.

Nancy Brinker is one of the tops of my dirtbag list. It is criminal that women who are most at risk are targeted with Pink Ribbon campaigns filled with toxic products and the same companies who offer the hope of treatment are hiding the ingredients of illness.

I'm so glad you learned the truth and stopped to share with us. It's a common theme for me and a favorite site for those who are tired of this cam, Think Before You Pink. We need to rethink how we think about most sources we trust, they have betrayed the public and time to turn the tables!

{"commentId":2765351,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
  • 1 vote
#2.5 - Thu Sep 4, 2008 11:04 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":1825538,"authorDomain":"curiousg"}

More of the same kind of 'protection' from King W's administration I don't need.

It is scary just how much we don't know, and now can't know, about how our food is produced.

{"commentId":1825538,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"curiousg"}
  • 6 votes
Reply#3 - Wed May 21, 2008 9:29 AM EDT
{"commentId":1826286,"authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
More of the same kind of 'protection' from King W's administration I don't need.

Much as I love to blame Dubbya, this isn't all his fault. The process of undermining the regulatory agencies goes back to their creation. Nixon appointed Ruckleshouse to head EPA at its creation and he was on the Monsanto Board. The idea of MRL or maximum residue levels and tolerance amounts has been growing ever since.

The entire industry of gmo food being fed to the public without our knowledge dates to Bush-Quayle. The biotech was unveiled as a plan to flourish unhindered by government in an environment of regulatory relief. No one did more to grow the corporate control than Clinton.

This is an ongoing process resulting from a Congress and political system that's corrupt to the core and a media that lets too much go unreported. Dubbya has just behaved as any arrogant heir who knows he's untouchable and raised the bar. Unless the media gets on board and starts reporting names not an alphabet soup of acronyms that hide front group agendas in defending the indefensible they'll kill us all, slowly.

{"commentId":1826286,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
  • 7 votes
#3.1 - Wed May 21, 2008 12:01 PM EDT
{"commentId":1827589,"authorDomain":"curiousg"}

No argument from me, keep up the good fight, Pamela!

{"commentId":1827589,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"curiousg"}
  • 3 votes
#3.2 - Wed May 21, 2008 4:30 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":1826516,"authorDomain":"tj"}

Great article Pamela!

Not only is this informative and frightening about our food, but it's been posted on MSNBC under the Newsvine Correspondents section.

Looks like Al Olson and his team are keeping a close eye on ConsumerVine.

Very nice!

{"commentId":1826516,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"tj"}
  • 6 votes
Reply#4 - Wed May 21, 2008 12:45 PM EDT
{"commentId":1829124,"authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
but it's been posted on MSNBC under the Newsvine Correspondents section.

Who'd ever dream a piece of mine, would be fit for corporate consumption? Am I slipping? *smirk*

{"commentId":1829124,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
  • 4 votes
#4.1 - Thu May 22, 2008 1:45 AM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":1826898,"authorDomain":"ForestBrowne"}

This is why corporations have full time legal teams and reams of lobbyists to push rules that benefit their bottom line. Unless bills are linked to local communities, and henceforth linked to the representative this kind of abuse will go on no matter who is in office.

Forest

{"commentId":1826898,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"ForestBrowne"}
  • 5 votes
Reply#5 - Wed May 21, 2008 2:12 PM EDT
{"commentId":1827608,"authorDomain":"curiousg"}

Yep, all the more reason to highlight abuses and to contact our representatives and let them know how you feel.

{"commentId":1827608,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"curiousg"}
  • 3 votes
#5.1 - Wed May 21, 2008 4:35 PM EDT
{"commentId":1827742,"authorDomain":"ForestBrowne"}

This administration doesn't fund itself to give oversite, kind of like the SEC.....pretty tough to control anything without money.

Forest

{"commentId":1827742,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"ForestBrowne"}
  • 3 votes
#5.2 - Wed May 21, 2008 5:06 PM EDT
{"commentId":1827822,"authorDomain":"curiousg"}

But the EPA and USDA are still funded by Congress, aren't they?

{"commentId":1827822,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"curiousg"}
  • 3 votes
#5.3 - Wed May 21, 2008 5:26 PM EDT
{"commentId":1828700,"authorDomain":"ForestBrowne"}

Executive discretion allows the administration to underfund in a practical fashion. The money is earmarked but not given.

Forest

{"commentId":1828700,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"ForestBrowne"}
  • 2 votes
#5.4 - Wed May 21, 2008 10:16 PM EDT
{"commentId":1829186,"authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
Forest...This administration doesn't fund itself to give oversite, kind of like the SEC.....pretty tough to control anything without money.

It's true the man with the gold makes the rules, but consumers drive this economy. We can show our anger and flex our economic muscle. Look at every dollar as a vote; put it where it does some good. Keep as much as possible small and local, Local Harvest gets my vote as a first source to search for food.

CuriousG...But the EPA and USDA are still funded by Congress, aren't they?

They do fall under Congress and while Forest is right about underfunding and cutting off, there are still billions that pass through to keep the doors open and the agribusiness buddies fed. The bulk of the power, influence and funds go to ADM, Cargill, Monsanto et al and it is for a small collection of commodities. Dairy, corn, soy, rice, wheat and cotton.

Those few crops use the bulk of the gmo seed and chemicals. Fight back by hitting them where they care, in the cash register. Soycott, quit buying the corn and soy, don't buy the sodas or drinks or hyped neutracuticals, like smart waters! Not smart at all except the marketing. Let their %$#@ filled cereals and snacks sit on the shelves and make oatmeal instead.

Try oatmeal cookies, even with some organic chocolate chips. No kid says no to cookies and a smattering of good choclate is great for the body and spirit. My kiddies grew up on good stuff hidden as muffins and cookies. They're better for you and cheaper, if you don't burn any. :~)

Yep, all the more reason to highlight abuses and to contact our representatives and let them know how you feel.

That's the ticket, call and keep asking, Can you hear me now? These jockers are there to serve the public and take our money to do it. They are not annointed rulers, but puyblic servants who need an attitude adjustment and a wake up call by hearing that people are fed up.

Please do remember though that the folks who answer the phones don't make the laws or enact the policies, they don't even get paid very well. Try to be brief, calm and polite and make one point. They tally the calls so issue of the day is the bigger bang for your buck,

All the Committees and Members have staff and the switchboard will connect you to any office in the Capitol. They will even locate your member by zip code if you're unsure.

Don't any one of you feel intimidated either. It's expected that employers, like we the people, do a job performance check on the employees. *smirk* Capitol Switchboard 202-224-3121

{"commentId":1829186,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
  • 5 votes
#5.5 - Thu May 22, 2008 2:15 AM EDT
{"commentId":1829216,"authorDomain":"curiousg"}

Right on, Pamela!

(Ohh, is it ok to use that phrase any more? Ohh, so what!)

{"commentId":1829216,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"curiousg"}
  • 2 votes
#5.6 - Thu May 22, 2008 2:26 AM EDT
{"commentId":1829253,"authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}

Yes it is perfectly perfect to say Right On. The kiddies go with, keep it chill, but what do they know about cool, we invented it. Check the hippest retro styles, we're totally groovy baby!!

{"commentId":1829253,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
  • 4 votes
#5.7 - Thu May 22, 2008 2:54 AM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":1827104,"authorDomain":"charles4000"}

Excellent article.
I had not heard about the EPA CHEERS program until I read #2.1 paragraph 2. Pretty intense stuff, as I found out via a googling, futuristic but in some highly absurd anti-humanistic bent. "They're killing themselves, let's watch..Give 'em a tee shirt too..." I'd love to interview these people....Irregardless.... This study is the definition of ethical ineptitude and moral debasement. Subsequently, as one that seriously believes in the certitude of the dire consequences of the continuing presence of pesticides, persistent organic pollutants; to read of this methodology provokes nausea. To utilize the EPA itself as a medium to spread disinformation and by that right protect those who will eventually be called out for their complicity in the calculated attempt to obscure this type of information from the public, is the height of corruption and nadir in the holding of the public trust.

{"commentId":1827104,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"charles4000"}
  • 4 votes
Reply#6 - Wed May 21, 2008 3:01 PM EDT
{"commentId":1829209,"authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
To utilize the EPA itself as a medium to spread disinformation and by that right protect those who will eventually be called out for their complicity in the calculated attempt to obscure this type of information from the public, is the height of corruption and nadir in the holding of the public trust.

I couldn't agree more. Sadly the examples are countless and one case more horrifying than the next. The American public and Natural resources have been turned to one big petrie dish where the idea of dying for profits is a measure that is on an ever sliding scale. How many are too many?

Feel free to add links, the more the merrier here. Folks can reference the identical source you're looking at. I'm sorry I snoozed on putting a link in but am so glad the right story turned up for you.

{"commentId":1829209,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
  • 3 votes
#6.1 - Thu May 22, 2008 2:24 AM EDT
{"commentId":1831732,"authorDomain":"charles4000"}

Sure Pamela
Here we go... This is a link to the Commitee on Science and Technology's letter to the Administrator of the EPA questioning the ethics and worth of the CHEERS study.
Here's a link to the Wikipedia article on CHEERS
The Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility published this article on the CHEERS program

Getting back to the crux of the story, this article from Common Dreams dated Nov 2007; details the EPA attempts to manage the outrage, but of course, according to the story, "EPA formally legalized human subject experimentation on February 6, 2007 [1]

This is a link to the EPA draft document on Scientific and Ethical Approaches for Observational Exposure Studies. AKA Human Subject Experimentation.

Terrifically this cannot pass without a caveat to one source of the funding, the American Chemistry Council, to the tune of 2.1 million [2] One should take a good look at some of the links in the Q&A section of the footnoted link.

Cheers!

{"commentId":1831732,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"charles4000"}
  • 4 votes
#6.2 - Thu May 22, 2008 5:51 PM EDT
{"commentId":1832635,"authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}

☀ ☤ that's a happy Rx!! Mwwah, that's a big kiss and it comes with a hug too. ☀

{"commentId":1832635,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
  • 4 votes
#6.3 - Thu May 22, 2008 11:28 PM EDT
{"commentId":1832654,"authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
Terrifically this cannot pass without a caveat to one source of the funding, the American Chemistry Council, to the tune of 2.1 million

Those fellas are all heart, caring about exposure effects, from conception to age of consumption.

{"commentId":1832654,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
  • 4 votes
#6.4 - Thu May 22, 2008 11:35 PM EDT
{"commentId":1834339,"authorDomain":"charles4000"}

ah hilarious!

{"commentId":1834339,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"charles4000"}
  • 3 votes
#6.5 - Fri May 23, 2008 1:28 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":1827946,"authorDomain":"Infohack"}

Here's a disturbing little fact I found on the Farm Bill currently being fought over:

"Farm Bill Blocks Court-Ordered Release Of Subsidy Program Data Under FOIA" - Mulch Blog

A provision secretly tucked into the Farm Bill Conference Report (Sec. 1619, "Information Gathering") nullifies a recent, major federal appeals court decision under the Freedom of Information Act that ordered USDA to make public large amounts of data crucial to monitoring the economic and environmental impacts of multi-billion-dollar farm subsidy and conservation programs.

Apparently, like the plan to do away with pesticide reporting, the government's answer to citizen concerns is to simply make the data unavailable.

{"commentId":1827946,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"Infohack"}
  • 6 votes
Reply#7 - Wed May 21, 2008 6:04 PM EDT
{"commentId":1827961,"authorDomain":"curiousg"}

Thank you Infohack, you should seed this as a separate article to get more eyeballs on it.

{"commentId":1827961,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"curiousg"}
  • 6 votes
#7.1 - Wed May 21, 2008 6:09 PM EDT
{"commentId":1829213,"authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
Thank you Infohack, you should seed this as a separate article to get more eyeballs on it.

Yes please infohack, what CG said, but give us a link here, so no one misses the leap! :~)

{"commentId":1829213,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
  • 5 votes
#7.2 - Thu May 22, 2008 2:25 AM EDT
{"commentId":1831302,"authorDomain":"Infohack"}

OK, I seeded it here:

Farm Bill Blocks Court-Ordered Release Of Subsidy Program Data Under FOIA.

Another issue I'm trying to track down is a provision in earlier version of the bill that would have exempted all records related to the Agriculture Department's animal identification system from the FOIA, relating to Mad Cow disease reporting, but I'm not sure where that stands at this point.

{"commentId":1831302,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"Infohack"}
  • 4 votes
#7.3 - Thu May 22, 2008 3:58 PM EDT
{"commentId":1831329,"authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}

I seem to recall tucking something of that sort into my files and will poke around for it at first chance, if someone here doesn't beat me to it. :~)

{"commentId":1831329,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
  • 4 votes
#7.4 - Thu May 22, 2008 4:04 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":1831004,"authorDomain":"cyregray"}

Thanks for the Update Pamela, how apropos - anything that threatens profit can be ignored. Psychopathic Politics at it's most egregious.

{"commentId":1831004,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"cyregray"}
  • 4 votes
Reply#8 - Thu May 22, 2008 2:40 PM EDT
{"commentId":1831088,"authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}

So much that seems confusing is as clear as a bell, when you follow the money! :~)

{"commentId":1831088,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
  • 5 votes
#8.1 - Thu May 22, 2008 3:03 PM EDT
{"commentId":1833636,"authorDomain":"tj"}
So much that seems confusing is as clear as a bell, when you follow the money! :~)

my sentiments exactly!

{"commentId":1833636,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"tj"}
  • 3 votes
#8.2 - Fri May 23, 2008 10:18 AM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":2749647,"authorDomain":"bev5k"}

There are 73 chemicals on the EPAs endocrine disruptors list. Check it out at, you know, add www, then epa, then ., then gov/endo. Don't know how to cleverly add them in as you guys do...

{"commentId":2749647,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"bev5k"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#9 - Thu Sep 4, 2008 9:46 AM EDT
{"commentId":2765380,"authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
Don't know how to cleverly add them in as you guys do...

Once you have been here a little while they give you a little toolbar on the comment box and that lets you highlight the section you want to link and then paste the URL in the pop up box. :~)

{"commentId":2765380,"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582","authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
  • 1 vote
#9.1 - Thu Sep 4, 2008 11:06 PM EDT
Reply
{"canLink":false,"threadId":"267472","isPrivate":false}
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
{"threadId":"267472","contentId":"1502582"}
Start TrackingStart Tracking
Stop TrackingStop Tracking