Anyone who has been paying attention to the Bush Administration appointees knows that cronyism, industry control of key regulatory agencies, cutbacks in funding and reduction of oversight have severely compromised the systems established to protect the public interests.
Instead, the effects of lobbyists chipping away at standards, to achieve greater latitudes for their respective clients, has turned America's security blanket into a tattered remnant that barely covers any of us.
Nowhere is integrity and effectiveness more critical than at the FDA where the things we put into our bodies are in the hands of others. There is little that involves so much responsibility and trust.
My own reporting about the lack of testing and oversight in the genetically altered foods has led me to cite countless stories by agency employees and watchdog organizations warning of the risks.
Whistle blowers within the agencies have been stifled and smeared, transfered outside their areas of expertise and faced with career ending repercussions for speaking out. Still they step forward and put their lives on the line to do what is right.
News of the effects has been evident as toxic products and tainted foods appear with greater frequency. Now a confidential report prepared for the FDA Science Board, titled FDA Science and Mission at Risk, confirms the ugly reality of this war on science and the lack of consumer protections.
It is expressed best by the summary statement at the conclusion of the Executive Overview -
In contrast to previous reviews that warned crisis would arise if funding issues were not addressed, recent events and our findings indicate that some of those crisis are now realities and American lives are at risk
As much as my research has focused on the regulatory failings of so many of the Federal functions, there has been a keen awareness that the career employees, and its counterparts at the EPA and UDSA especially with regard to food safety are dedicated to protecting human health and the environment. These individuals have had an impossible task.
To grasp the full magnitude of the responsibility and challenges one needs only to look at the point made in the introduction that notes, the FDA is responsible for regulating approximately $1 trillion dollars in consumer products that reflect one quarter of all consumer spending annually.
One quarter of every consumer dollar is a mind boggling value. It is no surprise the FDA is struggling, considering that figure is weighed against an an agency which has had cutbacks in tools, staff and funding as the complexities and scope of their responsibilities have exploded so too have the numbers of lobbyists and corporate means to pressure and pervert the job of consumer protection.
Major findings of the report came as no surprise to me as these groups have been under the influence and attack by Monsanto and their petrochemical friendsters for decades. The report states -
The FDA cannot fulfill its mission because its scientific base has eroded and its scientific organizational structure is weak.
The nation's food supply is at risk. Crisis management in FDA's two food safety centers, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN) and Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM), has drawn attention and resources away from FDA's ability to develop the science base and infrastructure needed to efficiently support innovation in the food industry, provide effective routine surveillance, and conduct emergency outbreak investigation activities to protect the food supply.
FDA's inability to keep up with the scientific advances means that American lives are at risk. While the world of drug discovery and development has undergone revolutionary change -- shifting from cellular to molecular and gene-based approaches -- FDA's evaluation methods have remained largely unchanged over the last half century. Likewise, evaluation methods have not kept pace with major advances in medical devices and use of products in combination.
Since an informed public is the greatest protection any one can possibly hope for, the link for the pdf version of the report is linked below, for however long it is available. If you care to read it at your leisure my recommendation would be to download and save the pdf file, since there's no assurance it will remain a viable link.
There is a great deal more that could be reported about the specifics of the findings and in the days and weeks to come no doubt the mainstream media and other groups will have their take on this. For me it is the smoking gun, the wake up call, the truth that for so long I have been harping on. Our health is in peril from a Congress that is as irresponsible as it is greedy. The makers of the foods and drugs are as criminal in their pursuit of profits to the point that I see as tantamount to genocide as undermining safety standards takes lives to make a buck.
But more than anything I would like to give credit and thanks to those staff who struggle against the odds to speak the truth and continue to show up and battle from within their respective agencies to provide the protections corporate Congress and fat cat friends make a Herculean task for them to do.
I hope every consumer will take the warning and demand a redistribution of our Nation's priorities and a shift in focus to protect us by first taking the industry out of Washington. One phone call at a time, one dollar at a time, one friend at a time, we must end the Wall Street rule of Washington and the fraud that has us dying for profits. There is no more powerful force than a dedicated human heart, now lets get a few hundred million to get the handful to serve us or get out of the roles paying for public service.
I've already sent an email to my representatives, now you can too. Here's a good link.
Thanks, Pamela for brining this to our attention! Its good to see some are being truthful to extent they can, but in reality these findings, though they arent unexpected, actually just really piss me off.
Thank you for the link.
One thing though, this is not new to the Bush Administration by any stretch of the imagination. This kind of thing has been known since I worked for the government.
The way things work is that Congress passes a law to promote something, say "Food Safety". They make a big splash for the folks at home. Then the appropriations bill comes up, they refuse to fund the service. If they are asked they feign surprise that the bill was not implemented. Congress controls how much can be done. Both parties are complicit with the process.
Thank you for understanding my point. The current administration does have the responsibility for what is (or is not) happening in this area but I fear that by scapegoating them we fall into the trap that Congress has set about many things where legislation has passed but funding for the legislation has been withheld.
Got it Pamela,
I'm going to send emails to everyone I know with this article and the link to the pdf and the link vicaxp so graciously provided. If this doesn't outrage people, they must be dead. Bravo to the person or persons that leaked this report, they've done us a wonderful service...
Our health is in peril from a Congress that is as irresponsible as it is greedy.
By 2010, when (and if) the Bush tax reductions are fully in place, an astonishing 52 percent of the total tax cuts will go to the richest one percent—whose average 2010 income will be $1.5 million. Where have we seen this deranged fiscal strategy before? Remember Ronald Reagan and Supply Side Economics? In the early 1980s, Reagan promised the nation that if we lowered tax rates on the wealthy, the economy would grow so much the federal budget would be balanced "within three years, maybe even two."
The FDA cannot fulfill its mission because its scientific base has eroded and its scientific organizational structure is weak.
the school board in rural south-central Pennsylvania community is believed to have become the first in the nation to mandate the teaching of "intelligent design," which holds that the universe is so complex that it must have been created by an unspecified higher power. President Bush said that he senses a "Third Awakening" of religious devotion in the United States that has coincided with the nation's struggle with international terrorists, a war that he depicted as "a confrontation between good and evil." Bush told a group of conservative journalists that he notices more open expressions of faith among people he meets during his travels and suggested that might signal a broader revival similar to other religious movements in history. Bush noted that some of President Abraham Lincoln's strongest supporters were religious people "who saw life in terms of good and evil"" he added. "It seems to me that there's a Third Awakening."
*
On Halloween, Pres. Bush nominated Edward Schafer for the post of Agriculture Secretary. Schafer is a two-time North Dakota governor and former co-chairman of the Governors Biotechnology Partnership. While the White House is highlighting Schafer's experience at directing emergency aid to the 1997 flooding disaster, voters and the Senate would do well to consider his role in shielding the biotech industry from consumer product labeling laws.
According to an online search, Ed Schafer was the former co-chairman of the Governors Biotechnology Partnership. He was instrumental in getting former Pres. Clinton to back off of requirements that GM modified foods be labeled as such. See the article from The Guardian in May of 2000, titled, "Clinton bows to food producers."
There was quite a flurry of press about Mr. Schafer in 2000. You might like to look up the Salon article from its archive, "Stalking the wild Frankensalmon," from May 5, 2000. Quote:
"On Wednesday, 13 governors joined forces with the biotech industry to try to persuade American consumers to become more enthusiastic consumers of engineered food. "It makes sense to say that this isn't just the big, bad chemical companies trying to engineer something to jam down your throats," said North Dakota Gov. Ed Schafer. How political is the coalition? Consider that two of the group's three Democratic governors are from states housing the headquarters of biotech gorillas Monsanto and DuPont."
And an editorial and letter to editor in Gentech, also from May 2000, has even more of his own words about the 'promised land' of GM foods...
" In 1998, the Governor let his constituents know his innermost feelings about the "new" agriculture. In his State of the State address, he said: "...today different winds blow across our fields of waving wheat. Washington has changed the rules on...agriculture."
His 1999 address included a commercial for Monsanto's pesticide: "Every day I read about a new innovation...Roundup-ready crops..." This year, the governor made no mistake about his intentions: "Genetic engineering will make farms smaller, more specialized and more profitable."
This ill-informed politician is the chief executive of an agricultural state, North Dakota, which produces enormous surpluses. Farmers in his state are paid subsidies not to grow corn and soybeans, yet the governor believes that genetically modified foods are the keys to easing world hunger. "
Oh, Pamela --
I hadn't seen that Salon article before
Well, you did see that Salon article referred to, at least -- he was quoting from my article on the Halloween nomination of Schaefer to the Ag Secretary post. Shoulda given a link. Here.
It's nice to be quoted. It's even nicer to be credited, I SPY.
I was not sure where that came from Minnie, the link only said NewsVine.com no reference to you. I actually thought it was one of pd's. I see someone likes your work enough to republish it. Maybe you should start using CC, then if you want your name included you can ask them to do so. For legal reasons it's best not to name an author unless they specifically want to be. Liable laws are much easier to negotiate than Copyright laws.
Thank you, thank you, thank you. I'm writing a letter right now!!!!
It doesn't inspire confidence in govt if they admit they do not have the technical resources & personnel to evaluate product safety. Well, geez, might as well disband it and use the money for -- I don't know, the SCHIPs program? Something 'wasteful' and 'too expensive' like that?
Hi Pamela,
Excellent article. You hit on many of the important points of a very complicated multilevel problem.
I happened to stumble upon the Senate Health Committee Meeting when channel changing one night,
"Developing a Comprehensive Response to Food Safety"
Date: Tuesday, December 4, 10:30 am
http://help.senate.gov/Hearings/2007_12_04/2007_12_04.html (note: meeting starts at 15:30 into the video so fast forward)
Here is Senator Kennedy's opening prepared speech for the meeting:KENNEDY ON DEVELOPING A COMPREHENSIVE RESPONSE FOR FOOD SAFETY I think he did a good job bringing the issues to the meeting.
I also believe Dr. Michael Taylor's speech helps to explain the underlying problems.
I listened to Michael Leavitt, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, detail his plan "Developing a Comprehensive Response to Food Safety" which seemed to me to primarily focus on protecting us from the unsafe food coming from other countries, without mentioning the problems within our country and our deteriorating, outdated, and shrinking public health system. As I listen to him I thought, "Why is his comprehensive plan so concerned with "them" when more importantly, we need to be looking at "us" based on the FDA Science and Mission at Risk Report of the Subcommittee on Science and Technology?" I was also interested in how the "comprehensive plan" addressed issues with local, state, and other national agencies who must work with the FDA for any plan to be effective. Our public health systems in the US are underfunded and understaffed. The public has a false sense of security that the government is protecting them not only in the food supply, but in water quality as well. The reality is the local and state departments do not have the resources to keep up, and federal agencies like the CDC who collect the data and identify the problems, do not have any regulatory power to force the states to make the changes needed to correct the problems.
Luckily Senator Kennedy asked Mr. Leavitt to address the findings of the Risk Report. (See the video of the meeting at 55:05 minutes to view Senator Kennedy's response and at 1:33:39.) Mr. Leavitt answered by saying it is in the plan. A more direct and summarized answer would have been helpful.
Some other the Senators seemed surprised by the testimony of the experts, and did not make me feel confident they had an accurate understanding of the problems. I believe consumers as well as the legislature believe our government agencies like the FDA and CDC have more authority and regulatory power when they don't. For example, even Secretary Leavitt said he assumed the FDA had authority, to force a recall, but found out they don't. They can only threaten companies that they will notify the public by contacting the press if they don't do a voluntary recall. (see video at 1:09:00)
Pam, I hope you are right and the Risk Report will stimulate some of the much needed changes that need to occur in our failing public health systems. It would be very helpful if National media sources summarized the report so the general public can fully understand the implications of the findings. Personal stories from people who became ill due to infective policies would also be helpful to help the public understand and motivate people to demand change and funding for these programs.
Unfortunately, it is very difficult to get the public to fight for changes about these issues unless it has happened to them personally or someone they love. It is not that people don't care, it is just human nature and a reality of our busy lives. Although creating panic and worry is generally not the best way to deal with issues, it is sometimes needed when apathy outweighs action on a issues. Thoughtful stories by skillful reporters can dig into the hearts of people and stimulate action not only during times of serious outbreaks, but also after the storm has calmed to remind people of the action that is needed to ensure prevention.
The Lobby Problem:
Instead, the effects of lobbyists chipping away at standards, to achieve greater latitudes for their respective clients, has turned America's security blanket into a tattered remnant that barely covers any of us.
I agree that lobby influence of the legislator is a serious problem and has made passing important public health laws and bills almost impossible or has caused alterations that make the law ineffective. In addition, while I have been working on Recreational Health issues in California over the last few years, I found out public health department employees (the ones who see the problems everyday and know what needs to be changed) are not allowed to speak directly to our state legislators. There was one bill in 2004 that was strongly opposed by the state health department yet passed almost unanimously in both houses due to lobby influence. Luckily the Governor listened to his public health advisers as opposed to the lobbyists for this bill and vetoed it. (The problem is not necessarily the spring water itself, it is how and where it is stored, contained, recirculated etc,.)
I will close for now and just say I am just glad the Science experts without a political agenda were asked to write up this report, and I hope this information will stimulate change in other areas of our pubic health systems as well..
Sorry, my writing skills are not that great, and I tend to blah, blah blah on these frustrating issues. Stacy
Whatever he says is carefully worded to sound like it offers consumer protection but he's Monsanto's man and one of the slickest lobbying loophole writer to ever undermine our rights. I had to get that out of my system before giving full attention to the rest of your comment or it would keep my attention coming back to Taylor. It also bugs me they add doctor to all the Ph.D.s as if folks reading might think some have a valid point in medical terms as well. Oooh, he's a bad one.
Thanks for that Pamela.
Oooh, he's a bad one.
LOL The Robert Reich defense :)
ROBERT REICH, FORMER US LABOR SECRETARY:Wednesday, 22 August, 2007
GEORGE NEGUS: Not known for exactly mincing your words, you said under George Bush that everything had gone upside down. In fact, the economy, you said, has gone to @!$%#. Which I am sure is a technical term.
ROBERT REICH: It's a complicated economic term taught in economic schools.
http://news.sbs.com.au/dateline/robert_reich_interview_130825
Thank you so much for the inside information. Like I said, I just stumbled on this meeting I am no expert and I am not familiar with any of the historical issues. I had no idea of Mr(the "Dr" was my mistake) Taylor's history, or Monsanto issue (I have spent so much time on Recreational water issues over the last several years I have not had time for much else.) The only reason I commented is because in dealing with water issues, I have seen the fundamental problems with our system as a whole. The reason I pointed to his speech was because I quickly scanned his opening paragraph and believe the following statement to be true:
"Unfortunately, FDA's current ability to provide food safety leadership, or even meet its basic food safety responsibilities, is badly constrained by:
• Obsolete statutes that date back to the 1930's and focus more on reacting to problems than preventing them; • Inadequate resources that are dwindling in the face of an increasingly complex, global food supply; • Internally fragmented and ineffectual organizational structure that makes FDA incapable today of providing effective food safety leadership."
I did not however, look closely at his history, motives, or recommendations to fix the problem. (I was lazy)
These issues are so complex and time consuming to research, yet so important to understand. I really appreciate writers like you who dig and report the inside story.
Thank you,
Stacy
Hi Pamela, (so sorry about shortening your name)
I ordered a copy of your DVD, it looks great!
My writing must be even worse than I thought based on your impression of me, do I really sound that naive?
You are one of the majority of Americans who trusts the regulatory system and the educational system to find the truth about what dangers exist to human health and the idea that it could be so corrupted is a very disturbing concept to begin to come to terms with.
I do not see myself this way because I am one of the people who became very ill due to our ineffective and underfunded public health system, outdated codes and laws, and irresponsible owners and operators who don't follow the rules to protect peoples health. Here is one of the stories about my case. http://rnwithld.newsvine.com/_news/2007/12/09/1152531-relaxing-spa-deadly-menace This story is only part of the problems I encountered during my public health investigation, and in the years that followed.
If you have time, look through some of my seeds.
I have been working really hard to find creative ways to warn people that they are not protected from RWIs by our current system.
http://rnwithld.newsvine.com/_news/2007/12/08/1151228-cdc-better-safety-needed-at-public-hot-tubs
This is why I joined newsvine. I really do not enjoy writing, but I have tried and tried to get national coverage of the issues, but I didn't have any takers. I just want people to know the inside story so they can make "informed decisions" before entering a public pool or spa.
I wish someone would have warned me....
Thank you so much. Keep up the great work! I look forward to the DVD.
Hi Pamela,
I have done a lot of reading over the last few days and although I knew GM products were out there, and that my common sense and gut feelings have always made me take the stance that they are dangerous, I never took the time to read more about it. I really had no idea about all of the data under my nose, and was and still am naive.... I will keep reading.....
According to this article, Mr. Leavitt needs to figure out how to protect others from us.... http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/press_releases/food_standards_agency_meet_28112007.html
This report should wake up a few more people awake -- out of that false sense of security we've been lulled into over the years. The truth has slowly come out about drugs that were rushed to market, the non-drug approaches that have been buried, the food additives that have been approved in spite of their long-term effects on human health.
Face it, the dept. is overwhelmed and there is no urgency about funding it adequately. Why bite the hands that paid for the election campaigns, hey?
Fortunately we have a few brave souls who will not be hushed. Pamela is one, and Newsvine is lucky to have her.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |